Request a call Login

  • Recently, the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) has taken a stand against workplace safety violations by suing a Georgia pesticide and agricultural chemical manufacturer. The lawsuit alleges that the company illegally terminated a worker who had filed a workplace safety complaint with federal regulators, shedding light on the crucial issue of employee protection and the cost of speaking up for safety.

    Allegations And Retaliation

    The DOL filed the suit against Gainesville-based Avenger Products LLC and its parent company, Kittrich Corp, citing the wrongful termination of an employee who had raised concerns about chemical exposures in the workplace. This move comes after a federal whistleblower investigation by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) uncovered the alleged retaliation against the worker for voicing safety apprehensions.

    OSHA’s Assistant Regional Administrator in Atlanta emphasized the impact of employer retaliation on employees’ willingness to engage with federal safety investigators. She stated that it creates a chilling effect that hampers the cooperation necessary for ensuring workplace safety.

    Legal Action And Consequences

    The lawsuit filed by the DOL seeks justice for the terminated employee by demanding back pay, compensatory and punitive damages, and damages for emotional distress from Avenger Products. It’s a strong message to employers who disregard their employees’ rights and prioritize their own interests over the well-being of their workforce.

    In addition, the DOL highlighted the company’s troubling history of workplace safety violations over 20 years, with proposed penalties totaling $254,189 between June 2018 and December 2019. These repeated violations underscore the urgency of addressing the company’s disregard for safety protocols and the need for accountability in safeguarding employees.

    How A PEO Can Help

    To ensure your business doesn’t make the same mistakes as Avenger Products LLC, consider partnering with a professional employer organization (PEO). A PEO like GMS offers various services; however, in this instance, it can help business owners prevent cases of workplace safety violations, employee lawsuits, and compliance issues. This strategic partnership mitigates the risk of costly lawsuits and ensures a focus on essential business operations. Ultimately, gaining access to the expertise and resources of a PEO empowers business owners to proactively safeguard their workforce and maintain a compliant, secure, and efficient work environment. Contact our safety team today to learn how we can make your business simpler, safer, and stronger.

  • In a bid to overturn the U.S. Department of Labor’s (DOL’s) final rule, which aims to tighten the criteria for classifying workers as independent contractors, Representative Kevin Kiley, R-California, and Senator Bill Cassidy, R-Louisiana, have introduced the Congressional Review Act (CRA) resolutions. While it’s scheduled to take effect on March 11, 2024, several business organizations are challenging the rule in court. Continue reading to dive into the key aspects and implications of this rule, the responses from stakeholders, and the potential outcomes of the ongoing battle.

    The Controversial Rule

    The new rule, set to replace the 2021 framework, introduces a more complex six-factor test to determine whether a worker should be classified as an employee or an independent contractor. This shift has been resisted by several business organizations, including the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, which has joined a lawsuit challenging the rule. The Chamber of Commerce argues that the new rule fosters ambiguity, restricting businesses’ ability to provide essential training to independent workers.

    Criticisms And Concerns

    Representative Kevin Kiley has strongly criticized the new rule, alleging it restricts the freedom of U.S. workers to operate as independent contractors. He contends the rule will jeopardize the livelihoods of millions of independent professionals and take away the freedom of many others to enjoy flexible work arrangements.

    In addition, introducing the six-factor test has raised concerns among businesses, particularly small businesses, regarding the potential confusion in determining worker classification. This uncertainty threatens the independent contractor model, enabling companies to scale their operations and retain specialized expertise while granting workers flexibility and control over their work activities.

    Six Factors Of The New Test

    The six factors of the new test include the following:

    1. The degree of employer control over the work

    2. The worker’s opportunity for profit or loss

    3. The level of skill and initiative required for the work

    4. The permanence of the working relationship

    5. The worker’s investment in equipment or material

    6. The extent to which the service rendered is integral to the employer’s business

    Seeking Clarity And Challenging The Rule

    Representative Kevin Kiley has called for the withdrawal of the independent contractor rule and has requested specific guidance from the DOL’s Wage and Hour Division Administrator on the criteria for employee and independent contractor classification. His concerns center on the need for clarity and understanding amidst the complexities of the new rule.

    The Road Ahead

    Despite the intense efforts to challenge the rule, the odds of a successful resolution remain uncertain. The Democrat-controlled Senate presents a formidable obstacle, requiring a two-thirds majority to overcome a potential presidential veto. In addition, the rule faces multiple legal challenges, with lawsuits alleging its illegality and deviation from the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA).

    The battle over the worker classification rule is poised to have far-reaching implications for businesses, workers, and the regulatory landscape. As the debate unfolds, stakeholders eagerly await the resolution of this issue, mindful of the potential impact on the workforce and the broader economy.

    Advice For A Small Business Owner

    We’ll make it simple – consider partnering with a professional employer organization (PEO). PEOs offer a compelling avenue for small businesses to address these challenges. By partnering with a PEO, small businesses can leverage expertise in HR management, gain access to comprehensive guidance on employment regulations, and receive tailored support in navigating worker classification complexities. As the landscape of labor regulations continues to evolve, the role of PEOs in assisting small businesses in effectively classifying workers and ensuring compliance with changing labor standards cannot be overstated. Meet Group Management Services (GMS), a certified PEO (CPEO), ready to take on the administrative burdens small business owners don’t have the time and energy to worry about. Get a quote from us today to start your journey with a simpler, safer, and stronger business.

  • The U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) has introduced a new rule under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) set to take effect on March 11, 2024. This rule could potentially lead to significant changes in how contract workers are classified, with potential implications for employers regarding benefits, insurance coverage, and exposure to employment-related lawsuits.

    The New Rule

    The Employee or Independent Contractor Classification Under the Fair Labor Standards Act rule, which replaces a rule established during the Trump Administration, aims to provide a clearer analysis for employers to determine a worker’s employment status. It re-adopts an enhanced economic realities test for worker classification that was previously in effect under an Obama administration rule. The new rule introduces a six-factor test to guide employers in determining a worker’s employment status under the FLSA, as opposed to the two-factor test under the Trump administration.

    The six factors in determining worker status under the new rule include the following:

    • Opportunity for profit or loss depending on managerial skill
    • Investments by the worker and potential employer
    • Degree of permanence of the work relationship
    • Nature and degree of control
    • Extent to which work performed is an integral part of the business
    • Skill and initiative

    Concerns With The New Rule

    Employers have expressed concerns about the broader impact of the new rule, fearing that it may have consequences beyond just minimum wage and overtime pay protections. While the DOL insists that the change is tailored and limited, some experts and industry professionals believe otherwise.

    In addition, the change in worker classification may have significant implications for various industries, particularly the construction sector. However, the National Electrical Contractors Association has expressed support for the new rule, citing its potential to address the widespread misclassification of workers across industries.

    The new rule faces court challenges, with concerns raised about potential confusion arising from workers being classified differently under various statutes and across different states. This confusion could lead to increased employment-related litigation, as highlighted by pending lawsuits challenging the rule.

    Implications For Workers And Employers

    While some labor unions and advocates support the reclassification of workers as employees for wage and hour purposes, certain groups, such as app-based gig workers and business advocates, are concerned about the potential loss of opportunities and flexibility if gig workers were to be classified as employees.

    In addition, the new rule may prompt employers to rethink their insurance coverage. This could lead to more confusion about the coverage of certain claims and the need for additional insurance, such as employment practices liability insurance (EPLI) or directors and officers (D&O) liability insurance.

    How A PEO Can Help

    In light of the changes stemming from the DOL’s new rule on employee classification, businesses may find value in seeking the support of a professional employer organization (PEO) like Group Management Services (GMS). PEOs offer expertise in navigating complex employment regulations, providing guidance on worker classification, and assisting in the management of benefits and insurance coverage. Through a partnership with GMS, businesses can proactively address the challenges posed by the new rule, ensuring compliance while maintaining their focus on core business operations. As the regulatory landscape continues to evolve, leveraging the resources and expertise of a PEO can empower businesses to adapt effectively and thrive in the face of changing employment practices and legal requirements. If you’re interested in learning more about what a partnership looks like with GMS, contact us today.